close
  • chevron_right

    Crypto and the US government are headed for a decisive showdown

    news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Tuesday, 9 August, 2022 - 13:52

Crypto and the US government are headed for a decisive showdown

Enlarge (credit: Elena Lacey | Getty Images)

If you have paid casual attention to crypto news over the past few years, you probably have a sense that the crypto market is unregulated—a tech-driven Wild West in which the rules of traditional finance do not apply.

If you were Ishan Wahi, however, you would probably not have that sense.

Wahi worked at Coinbase, a leading crypto exchange, where he had a view into which tokens the platform planned to list for trading—an event that causes those assets to spike in value. According to the US Department of Justice, Wahi used that knowledge to buy those assets before the listings, then sell them for big profits. In July, the DOJ announced that it had indicted Wahi, along with two associates, in what it billed as the “first ever cryptocurrency insider trading tipping scheme.” If convicted, the defendants could face decades in federal prison.

Read 34 remaining paragraphs | Comments

A New Controversy Erupts Around Ursula von der Leyen's Text Messages

EU #Regulation No. 1049/2001 guarantees citizens of the EU the "widest possible access" to all #documents in the possession of the #European Commission, the European #Parliament and the Council of the member states – as easily as possible.

  • chevron_right

    Crypto platforms need regulation to survive, says SEC boss

    news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Wednesday, 1 September, 2021 - 20:43

Crypto platforms need regulation to survive, says SEC boss

Enlarge (credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images )

The chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission is warning that cryptocurrency trading platforms are putting their own survival at risk unless they heed his call to work within the nation’s regulatory framework.

Gary Gensler told the Financial Times that while he remained “technology neutral,” crypto assets were no different than any others when it came to such public policy imperatives as investor protection, guarding against illicit activity and maintaining financial stability.

“At about $2 trillion of value worldwide, it’s at the level and the nature that if it’s going to have any relevance five and 10 years from now, it’s going to be within a public policy framework,” he said. “History just tells you, it doesn’t last long outside. Finance is about trust, ultimately.”

Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=m-iMBIBmGXo:-osXI0V6uF4:V_sGLiPBpWUindex?i=m-iMBIBmGXo:-osXI0V6uF4:F7zBnMyn0Loindex?d=qj6IDK7rITsindex?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
  • chevron_right

    Nvidia wants to buy CPU designer Arm—Qualcomm is not happy about it

    news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Friday, 12 February, 2021 - 22:26 · 1 minute

Some current Arm licensees view the proposed acquisition as highly toxic.

Enlarge / Some current Arm licensees view the proposed acquisition as highly toxic. (credit: Aurich Lawson / Nvidia)

In September 2020, Nvidia announced its intention to buy Arm, the license holder for the CPU technology that powers the vast majority of mobile and high-powered embedded systems around the world.

Nvidia's proposed deal would acquire Arm from Japanese conglomerate SoftBank for $40 billion—a number which is difficult to put into perspective. Forty billion dollars would represent one of the largest tech acquisitions of all time, but 40 Instagrams or so doesn't seem like that much to pay for control of the architecture supporting every well-known smartphone in the world, plus a staggering array of embedded controllers, network routers, automobiles, and other devices.

Today’s Arm doesn’t sell hardware

Arm's business model is fairly unusual in the hardware space, particularly from a consumer or small business perspective. Arm's customers—including hardware giants such as Apple, Qualcomm, and Samsung—aren't buying CPUs the way you'd buy an Intel Xeon or AMD Ryzen. Instead, they're purchasing the license to design and/or manufacture CPUs based on Arm's intellectual property. This typically means selecting one or more reference core designs, putting several of them in one system on chip (SoC), and tying them all together with the necessary cache and other peripherals.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=L61f4fggXdo:_QalKYyC2ZI:V_sGLiPBpWUindex?i=L61f4fggXdo:_QalKYyC2ZI:F7zBnMyn0Loindex?d=qj6IDK7rITsindex?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
  • chevron_right

    In a parting gift, EPA finalizes rules to limit its use of science

    news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Tuesday, 5 January, 2021 - 23:52 · 1 minute

A bird stands on a tube snaking through the water.

Enlarge / BARATARIA BAY, Lousiana - JULY 14: A young seagull rests on a boom used to contain the oil spill July 14, 2010. In the future, should this bird be killed by the oil, nobody could be held responsible. (credit: Mario Tama / Getty Images )

With the days counting down to the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden, the Trump administration has been undertaking a series of actions that will make it more difficult for its replacements to reverse any of its policies or pursue new ones. This is especially true in the area of environmental regulations, where both the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Interior have recently issued decisions.

Over the last few days, Interior has issued new rules that will allow industries to kill migratory birds with impunity, and the department has moved ahead with plans to lease portions of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for drilling tomorrow. Meanwhile, the EPA has finally pushed through a new rule that could severely limit the ability of the agency to establish future regulations. The only small bit of consolation is that the EPA's final rule is less awful than some earlier drafts.

Only the science we like

The EPA's new rule , which will be formally published tomorrow, is an attempt to set additional standards for the evidence it considers when establishing new regulations for pollutants. In principle, the rule sounds great: it wants the data behind the scientific papers it uses to be made publicly available before it can be used to support regulatory decisions. In reality, the rule is problematic, because many of these studies rely on patient records that need to be kept confidential. In other cases, the organizations with the best information on some environmental hazards are the companies that produce or work with them, and they may not be interested in sharing proprietary data.

Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=2uZV2i5qLus:UaxndJzAIxQ:V_sGLiPBpWUindex?i=2uZV2i5qLus:UaxndJzAIxQ:F7zBnMyn0Loindex?d=qj6IDK7rITsindex?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
  • chevron_right

    Italy fines Apple $12 million over iPhone marketing claims

    news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Tuesday, 1 December, 2020 - 18:38

The iPhone 11 Pro Max

Enlarge / The iPhone 11 Pro Max. (credit: Samuel Axon)

Italy has again hit Apple with a fine for what the country's regulators deem to be misleading marketing claims, though the fine is only €10 million ($12 million)—a pittance from a company like Apple.

This time around, Italy's Autorita Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) claims that Apple told consumers that many iPhone models are water resistant but that the iPhones are not as resistant as Apple says. In one example, Apple claimed the iPhone 8 was rated IP67 for water and dust resistance, meaning the phone could survive for up to 30 minutes under three feet of water. But the Italian regulator says that's only true under special lab conditions with static and pure water conditions.

An announcement by the AGCM specifically names the iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, iPhone XR, iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, iPhone 11, iPhone 11 Pro and iPhone 11 Pro Max. Presumably, the claims would also apply to the iPhone 12 line, but that line was only just introduced to the market.

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments

index?i=TNwXk4IzBbM:pt12t1PwCL0:V_sGLiPBpWUindex?i=TNwXk4IzBbM:pt12t1PwCL0:F7zBnMyn0Loindex?d=qj6IDK7rITsindex?d=yIl2AUoC8zA