close
    • chevron_right

      The EU’s great green retreat benefits the far right. For the rest of us, it’s a looming disaster | Arthur Neslen

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian · Tuesday, 2 April - 06:00

    Environmental pledges are being shredded to please agribusiness and appease extremists. It’s a terrible mistake

    The EU’s great green deal cave-in has been nothing less than spectacular. As aggressive lobbying and violent farmers protests ramped up in the last year, Brussels has killed plans to cut pesticide use by half, to green farming practices, to ban toxic “forever” chemicals , to rein in livestock emissions and, last week, to restore nature to 20% of Europe’s land and seas.

    The aim may have been to create breathing space. Predictably, that hasn’t worked. The bloc’s anti-deforestation regulation seems likely to be the next green reform for the chop, with 20 agriculture ministers reportedly calling for it to be pared back and suspended on Monday, citing “administrative burdens”.

    Continue reading...
    • chevron_right

      EU pumps four times more money into farming animals than growing plants

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian · Monday, 1 April - 15:00

    CAP scheme, which pays more to farms that occupy more land, drives ‘perverse outcomes for a food transition’, says study

    The EU has made polluting diets “artificially cheap” by pumping four times more money into farming animals than growing plants, research has found.

    More than 80% of the public money given to farmers through the EU’s common agriculture policy (CAP) went to animal products in 2013 despite the damage they do to society, according to a study in Nature Food . Factoring in animal feed doubled the subsidies that were embodied in a kilogram of beef, the meat with the biggest environmental footprint, from €0.71 to €1.42 (61p to £1.22).

    Continue reading...
    • chevron_right

      Dover health authority says inland border facility will be ‘open door for disease’

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian · Wednesday, 27 March - 18:41

    Sevington site was never designed to handle volume of imports envisaged by post-Brexit changes due in April, port’s health chief warns

    An inland facility set up to carry out checks on nearly all EU meat and dairy imports coming through Dover will be unable to cope when post-Brexit rules come in next month, the port’s health authority has warned.

    The Dover Port Health Authority (DPHA) said the Sevington facility in Ashford, which is 22 miles inland, had not been designed to handle the scale of imports expected, and claimed its geographical position would “create an open door for disease and food fraud”.

    Continue reading...
    • chevron_right

      ‘You’ve got to be joking’: Mandelson dismisses prospect of UK rejoining EU

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian · Wednesday, 27 March - 14:38

    Labour peer says there is little desire among voters for a referendum and in Brussels for renegotiations

    Peter Mandelson has dismissed the prospect of an incoming Labour government taking Britain back into the EU, saying “you’ve got to be joking” that Brussels would want to renegotiate the UK’s membership.

    The Labour peer, a former EU trade commissioner and close adviser to Keir Starmer, said rejoining the 27-country bloc would require a referendum that UK voters had little desire for, after the Conservatives’ botched handling of Brexit.

    Continue reading...
    • chevron_right

      Meta’s “overpriced” ad-free subscriptions make privacy a “luxury good”: EU suit

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 30 November - 18:37

    Meta’s “overpriced” ad-free subscriptions make privacy a “luxury good”: EU suit

    Enlarge (credit: NurPhoto / Contributor | NurPhoto )

    Backlash over Meta's ad-free subscription model in the European Union has begun just one month into its launch.

    On Thursday, Europe's largest consumer group, the European Consumer Organization (BEUC), filed a complaint with the network of consumer protection authorities. In a press release , BEUC alleges that Meta's subscription fees for ad-free access to Facebook and Instagram are so unreasonably high that they breach laws designed to protect user privacy as a fundamental right.

    "Meta has been rolling out changes to its service in the EU in November 2023, which require Facebook and Instagram users to either consent to the processing of their data for advertising purposes by the company or pay in order not to be shown advertisements," BEUC's press release said. "The tech giant’s pay-or-consent approach is unfair and must be stopped."

    Read 22 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      “We’re not ‘gatekeepers,’” Apple and Microsoft tell European Union

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Tuesday, 5 September, 2023 - 13:47

    Apple and Microsoft have argued with Brussels that some of their services are insufficiently popular to be designated as “gatekeepers” under new landmark EU legislation designed to curb the power of Big Tech.

    Brussels’ battle with the two US companies over Apple’s iMessage chat app and Microsoft’s Bing search engine comes ahead of Wednesday’s publication of the first list of services to be regulated by the Digital Markets Act.

    The legislation imposes new responsibilities on tech companies, including sharing data, linking to competitors, and making their services interoperable with rival apps.

    Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of data collection

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 30 March, 2023 - 17:32 · 1 minute

    Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of data collection

    Enlarge (credit: NurPhoto / Contributor | NurPhoto )

    Meta announced that starting next Wednesday, some Facebook and Instagram users in the European Union will for the first time be able to opt out of sharing first-party data used to serve highly personalized ads, The Wall Street Journal reported . The move marks a big change from Meta's current business model, where every video and piece of content clicked on its platforms provides a data point for its online advertisers.

    People “familiar with the matter” told the Journal that Facebook and Instagram users will soon be able to access a form that can be submitted to Meta to object to sweeping data collection. If those requests are approved, those users will only allow Meta to target ads based on broader categories of data collection, like age range or general location.

    This is different from efforts by other major tech companies like Apple and Google, which prompt users to opt in or out of highly personalized ads with the click of a button. Instead, Meta will review objection forms to evaluate reasons provided by individual users to end such data collection before it will approve any opt-outs. It's unclear what cause Meta may have to deny requests.

    Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Epic takes its fight with Apple across the sea with new EU complaint

      Kate Cox · news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Wednesday, 17 February, 2021 - 17:51

    <em>Fortnite</em> on an iPhone... back when that was a thing.

    Enlarge / Fortnite on an iPhone... back when that was a thing. (credit: Savusia Konstantin | Getty Images )

    Epic Games, maker of Fortnite , is loading up a new map in its ongoing fight against Apple as it files an antitrust complaint against the mobile phone maker in the European Union.

    Epic alleges in its complaint that Apple uses its sole control over iOS apps to block competitors and benefit itself at developers' expense in violation of European competition law, the company said today.

    "What’s at stake here is the very future of mobile platforms," Epic CEO Tim Sweeney said in a written statement. "We will not stand idly by and allow Apple to use its platform dominance to control what should be a level digital playing field. It’s bad for consumers, who are paying inflated prices due to the complete lack of competition among stores and in-app payment processing. And it’s bad for developers, whose very livelihoods often hinge on Apple’s complete discretion as to who to allow on the iOS platform, and on which terms."

    Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    index?i=pBsEicYQetA:0c9Ft9WlCDM:V_sGLiPBpWUindex?i=pBsEicYQetA:0c9Ft9WlCDM:F7zBnMyn0Loindex?d=qj6IDK7rITsindex?d=yIl2AUoC8zA