close
    • chevron_right

      F1 wants to ban tire heaters—here’s why that’s a good idea

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Monday, 1 May, 2023 - 21:06 · 1 minute

    The rear of the Red Bull RB19 Formula 1 car on the track in Baku

    Enlarge / This is the rear of the Red Bull RB19. I can't find a good photo of it with the DRS flap open, but the bit that says Oracle drops down flat, reducing the amount of drag the wing causes and increasing the car's top speed. (credit: Bryn Lennon - Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images)

    Formula 1 held its annual street race in Azerbaijan this past weekend. With its very high-speed track, the city of Baku has seen some rather exciting racing. But that was not the case this year, which proved more soporific than Ambien. But at least one other race was truly entertaining this weekend, as the World Endurance Championship visited Belgium. Watching the two makes me think it's time for F1 to drop a couple of the driver assists.

    Part 1: The case for banning DRS

    F1's problem this year is one it often suffers from. One team has designed a better car than anyone else, and assuming that team—Red Bull Racing—stays reliable, it's almost certain to win both the drivers' and constructors' championships. It's not Red Bull's fault it did a much better job than anyone else this year, but its advantage is magnified by a techno-crutch that was added to the sport some years ago to try to increase overtaking.

    It's called DRS (drag reduction system), and it was introduced in 2011 to address the problem of one F1 car not being able to follow another closely enough through a corner that it could then build up the necessary speed to overtake.

    Read 17 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Why racing drivers trust their lives to a fireproof fabric called Nomex

      Jonathan M. Gitlin · news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Friday, 18 December, 2020 - 12:54 · 1 minute

    A racing driver is helped away from a fiery crash

    Enlarge / F1 driver Romain Grosjean climbs over a crash barrier and away from the flames consuming his race car after a crash at this year's Bahrain Grand Prix. (credit: Formula 1)

    When Romain Grosjean's F1 season came to a spectacular end in Bahrain a few weeks ago , it was the fire that really drove the headlines. High-G crashes aren't necessarily common in the sport, but they happen once or twice a year and, thanks to rigorous design and testing, are highly survivable. An F1 car bursting into flames is a much rarer event—Grosjean's fiery crash is the first for over 30 years, and the sight of flames strikes a kind of primal fear, bringing to mind drivers like Roger Williamson and Niki Lauda.

    Just about everyone who straps into a racing car—regardless of discipline or series—does so wearing layers of a synthetic fabric called Nomex. It was designed in the late 1950s for DuPont by scientist Wilfred Sweeney, and DuPont has manufactured Nomex commercially for a little over half a century. The material's introduction to the world of motorsport began in 1966, when racing driver and safety advocate Bill Simpson met astronaut Pete Conrad, who introduced him to Nomex. The following year, Simpson's company supplied Nomex overalls to all but three drivers in that year's Indianapolis 500.

    Fire protection for drivers has come a long way in 53 years, and I got in touch with Yves Bader, development manager of mechanical protection and consumer apparel at DuPont, as well as Joe Foster, industry vertical manager automotive at the company, to find out how today's fireproof fabrics have evolved since those early days.

    Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    index?i=wFV_k8Dtg_E:wW50O1OBpso:V_sGLiPBpWUindex?i=wFV_k8Dtg_E:wW50O1OBpso:F7zBnMyn0Loindex?d=qj6IDK7rITsindex?d=yIl2AUoC8zA