close
    • chevron_right

      Rare, pristine first edition of Copernicus’ De Revolutionibus up for sale

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 9 March, 2023 - 21:00 · 1 minute

    Nicolaus Copernicus revolutionized science with the publication of <em>De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium</em> in 1543.

    Enlarge / Nicolaus Copernicus revolutionized science with the publication of De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium in 1543. (credit: Sophia Rare Books)

    Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus revolutionized science when he challenged the 1,400-year dominance of Ptolemaic cosmology with the publication of De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium ( On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres ) in 1543. His manuscript suggested that the Sun, not the Earth, was at the center of the Solar System, thereby altering our entire view of the Universe and our place in it. Now, a rare, pristine first edition is up for sale for $2.5 million.

    The high price tag is a testament not just to the historical importance of the work, but also to the clear provenance and excellent condition of this particular edition, according to Christian Westergaard of Sophia Rare Books, who is handling the sale. (He will be exhibiting the edition at the upcoming New York International Antiquarian Book Fair next month.) A similar copy with just a couple of repairs and a contemporary binding sold at auction for $2.2 million in 2008. But most first editions of De Revolutionibus that come up for sale have dubious provenance, fake bindings, facsimile pages, stamps removed, or similar alterations that decrease the value.

    Noted Copernican scholar Owen Gingerich spent 35 years tracking down and examining every surviving copy of the first two editions of De Revolutionibus, ultimately locating 276 first-edition copies (of about 500 originally printed) around the world, most of them part of institutional collections. There are only a handful of editions from Gingerich's census (maybe 10 to 15) in the hands of private collectors, including this one. "It's the holy grail for me," Westergaard told Ars. "If you're going to handle a book in this price range, you want good provenance. You don't want it to suddenly be reported stolen from some library. You want it to be in Gingerich's census. In my opinion, this copy has it all."

    Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Neutrons unlock the secrets of Antonie van Leeuwenhoek’s microscopes

      Jennifer Ouellette · news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Sunday, 16 May, 2021 - 21:48 · 1 minute

    First microscope by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

    Enlarge / First microscope by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. (credit: Tetra Images/Getty)

    In the late 17th century, a Dutch draper and self-taught scientist named Antonie van Leeuwenhoek earned renown for building some of the best microscopes available, at a time when the instrument was just beginning to revolutionize scientific inquiry. He rarely divulged his lens-making methods, however, leading to centuries of speculation as to how he achieved such superior magnifications.

    Now neutron tomography has enabled scientists at TU Delft in the Netherlands to peer inside van Leeuwenhoek's microscopes for the very first time. A new paper published in the journal Science Advances reveals that, far from requiring his own secret lens-crafting method, van Leeuwenhoek was a master craftsman who was able to achieve his extraordinary magnifications by honing and perfecting the typical lens production methods of his era.

    It's not entirely clear who invented the first bona fide microscope, but contenders for the claim include a late 16th century Dutch maker of spectacles named Zacharias Janssen , a neighboring rival spectacle manufacturer named Hans Lippershey , and a Dutch engineer and inventor named Cornelis Drebbel. Galileo noted the basic principle sometime after 1610, and built his own compound microscope after seeing one of Drebbel's instruments on display in Rome in 1624. He dubbed it the " occhiolino " or " little eye."

    Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    index?i=LW-mpLaGdCw:yArDxPAbftI:V_sGLiPBpWUindex?i=LW-mpLaGdCw:yArDxPAbftI:F7zBnMyn0Loindex?d=qj6IDK7rITsindex?d=yIl2AUoC8zA