• Nu chevron_right

    Caméras piéton, drones : que prévoit la loi Sécurité Globale en matière de vidéosurveillance ? / Numerama · Wednesday, 18 November - 15:39

drone surveillance

L'article 24 visant à empêcher de filmer le visage des forces de l'ordre au nom de leur intégrité physique et psychologique n'est pas la seule disposition de la proposition de loi sur la sécurité globale à retenir l'attention. D'autres mesures sont à relever, notamment dans le domaine de la vidéo. [Lire la suite]

Voitures, vélos, scooters... : la mobilité de demain se lit sur Vroom !

L'article Caméras piéton, drones : que prévoit la loi Sécurité Globale en matière de vidéosurveillance ? est apparu en premier sur Numerama .

  • Drones en manifestation : La Quadrature contre-attaque

    Nous venons de déposer un nouveau recours devant le tribunal administratif de Paris, en urgence, pour que la préfecture de police cesse sa surveillance par drones des manifestations. Alors que le Conseil d'État était clair en mai dernier et déclarait illégale l'utilisation des drones par la police p

  • Nu chevron_right

    Des élus européens demandent à Donald Trump de gracier Edward Snowden / Numerama · Monday, 24 August - 14:47

Edward Snowden

Donald Trump a laissé la porte ouverte à une éventuelle grâce présidentielle d'Edward Snowden. Plusieurs parlementaires européens ont depuis appelé le président américain à traduire cette pensée en acte. [Lire la suite]

Abonnez-vous à notre chaîne YouTube pour ne manquer aucune vidéo !

L'article Des élus européens demandent à Donald Trump de gracier Edward Snowden est apparu en premier sur Numerama .

  • Ar chevron_right

    College contact-tracing app readily leaked personal data, report finds / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 20 August - 20:05

A surveillance camera mounted on a wall on a sunny day.

Enlarge / A surveillance camera mounted on a wall on a sunny day. (credit: Thomas Winz / Getty)

In an attempt to mitigate the potential spread of COVID-19, one Michigan college is requiring all students to install an app that will track their live locations at all times. Unfortunately, researchers have already found two major vulnerabilities in the app that can expose students' personal and health data.

Albion College informed students two weeks before the start of the fall term that they would be required to install and run the contact tracing app, called Aura.

Exposure notification apps being deployed by states , based on the iOS and Android framework that Apple and Google announced earlier this year, are designed to minimize harms to privacy. That framework basically uses a phone's Bluetooth capabilities as a proximity sensor, to see if the phone it's installed on has been near a phone of someone who reports having tested positive for COVID-19.

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

  • Ar chevron_right

    Secret Service buys location data that would otherwise need a warrant / ArsTechnica · Monday, 17 August - 19:39

Stock photo of hands using smartphones against white background.

Enlarge / Dozens of apps on your phone know where you are, whether you're home, at a doctor's appointment, at the airport, or sitting still in a blank white room to pose artfully for a photo shoot. (credit: JGI | Tom Grill | Getty Images )

An increasing number of law enforcement agencies, including the US Secret Service, are simply buying their way into data that would ordinarily require a warrant, a new report has found, and at least one US senator wants to put a stop to it.

The Secret Service paid about $2 million in 2017-2018 to a firm called Babel Street to use its service Locate X, according to a document ( PDF ) Vice Motherboard obtained . The contract outlines what kind of content, training, and customer support Babel Street is required to provide to the Secret Service.

Locate X provides location data harvested and collated from a wide variety of other apps, tech site Protocol reported earlier this year. Users can "draw a digital fence around an address or area, pinpoint mobile devices that were within that area, and see where else those devices have traveled" in the past several months, Protocol explained.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

  • Worldwide mass surveillance by Germany’s intelligence service declared unconstitutional in landmark ruling on press freedom in the digital age | Reporters without borders

    In a much-anticipated verdict issued this morning, Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court has put an end to the groundless mass surveillance of global internet traffic by Germany’s foreign intelligence service, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND). The ruling, the most far-reaching in this field in the past 20 years, sends an important signal for the protection of press freedom in the digital age. Читать на русском / Read in Russian The court ruled that the BND law disregards both the freedom of the press guaranteed in article 5 and the freedom of telecommunications guaranteed in Article 10 of the Basic Law as it does not recognise that foreign surveillance must be conducted in conformity with the Basic Law. When revising the BND law, the legislature will have to take into account that foreign surveillance without cause is only possible in very few cases. Vulnerable groups of persons such as journalists must be granted special protection. Tighter criteria must also apply to the targeted surveillance of individuals. Furthermore, international surveillance must be controlled much more effectively by independent bodies with their own budgetary sovereignty. The ruling thus sets new standards in international human rights protection and for freedom of the press. “The Federal Constitutional Court has once again underlined the importance of press freedom, said Christian Mihr, Executive Director of RSF Germany. We are delighted that Karlsruhe is putting a stop to the escalating surveillance practices of the Federal Intelligence Service abroad”, Mihr added. Six international journalists, including renowned investigative reporters Khadija Ismajilova and Blaz Zgaga, had filed the constitutional complaint against the current BND law in cooperation with Reporters Without Borders (RSF), the civil rights NGO Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte, and four German media organisations. The German Act on Signal Intelligence of Foreigners Abroad governing the practices of the BND legalized pre-existing practices of international mass surveillance uncovered by Edward Snowden in 2013. Journalists and civil society organisations were alarmed at its potentially chilling impact on whistle-blowing and investigative journalism at a time when most communication takes place online. The plaintiffs argued that Article 1 of Germany’s Basic Law obliges the government to respect basic rights – irrespective of whether it is acting within Germany or abroad. Citizens of foreign states also have a right to privacy, the plaintiffs asserted, meaning that the BND may not intercept the communications and internet traffic of foreigners outside Germany without restrictions, as the BND law currently allows it to do. The Federal Constitutional Court has now unequivocally affirmed that this applies regarding Article 10 of the Basic Law guaranteeing the privacy of online communications. It was precisely the commitment to fundamental rights, rejected by the BND, which motivated the foreign journalists to lodge their constitutional complaint. The mere possibility of permanent surveillance hinders their work because they are unable to build up trusting relationships with their sources. They now hope that the ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court will set standards for the activities of other states' intelligence services as well. Additional Background: More than seven years after Edward Snowden exposed a global system of mass intelligence surveillance, the Federal Constitutional Court has ruled on the legality of Germany's participation in these activities in the highest court. In the wake of the NSA scandal, a parliamentary investigative committee had brought to light the deep links between the US intelligence service and Germany’s BND, whereupon the then ruling coalition government passed a new BND law. However, instead of setting clear limits for the foreign intelligence service, the German government simply legalized the latter’s practically unlimited foreign surveillance - despite massive protests from civil society. RSF and the Society for Civil Liberties (GFF) then coordinated an alliance of internationally renowned journalists and media organizations. Together they filed a constitutional complaint against the BND law at the end of 2017. Among other things, the plaintiffs feared that the protection of sources was being undermined: If secret services were able to store and evaluate every communication, contact persons all over the world would gradually lose confidence in the media – and in the worst case no longer turn to the press with information on sensitive issues. Through this back door, the BND was also undermining German “editorial secrecy” or source protection, for example when intercepting the communications of foreign partner media of German media outlets collaborating on major international research projects such as the Panama Papers. Germany is ranked on 11th place out of 180 in RSF’s World Press Freedom Index.