• chevron_right

      It’s not worth paying to be removed from people-finder sites, study says

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 8 August - 17:30

    Folks in suits hiding behind trees that do not really obscure them

    Enlarge / For a true representation of the people-search industry, a couple of these folks should have lanyards that connect them by the pockets. (credit: Getty Images)

    If you've searched your name online in the last few years, you know what's out there, and it's bad. Alternately, you've seen the lowest-common-denominator ads begging you to search out people from your past to see what crimes are on their record. People-search sites are a gross loophole in the public records system, and it doesn't feel like there's much you can do about it.

    Not that some firms haven't promised to try. Do they work? Not really, Consumer Reports (CR) suggests in a recent study.

    "[O]ur study shows that many of these services fall short of providing the kind of help and performance you'd expect, especially at the price levels some of them are charging," said Yael Grauer, program manager for CR, in a statement .

    Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Instead of obtaining a warrant, the NSA would like to keep buying your data

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Saturday, 29 July, 2023 - 11:23

    National Security Agency headquarters.

    National Security Agency headquarters. (credit: Trevor Paglen, Wikimedia Commons )

    An effort by United States lawmakers to prevent government agencies from domestically tracking citizens without a search warrant is facing opposition internally from one of its largest intelligence services.

    Republican and Democratic aides familiar with ongoing defense-spending negotiations in Congress say officials at the National Security Agency (NSA) have approached lawmakers charged with its oversight about opposing an amendment that would prevent it from paying companies for location data instead of obtaining a warrant in court.

    Introduced by US representatives Warren Davidson and Sara Jacobs, the amendment, first reported by WIRED , would prohibit US military agencies from “purchasing data that would otherwise require a warrant, court order, or subpoena” to obtain. The ban would cover more than half of the US intelligence community, including the NSA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the newly formed National Space Intelligence Center, among others.

    Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      TikTok CEO fails to convince Congress that the app is not a “weapon” for China

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 23 March, 2023 - 22:21

    TikTok Chief Executive Officer Shou Zi Chew testifies before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

    Enlarge / TikTok Chief Executive Officer Shou Zi Chew testifies before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. (credit: Kent Nishimura / Contributor | Los Angeles Times )

    For nearly five hours, Congress members of the House Committee on Energy & Commerce grilled TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew over concerns about the platform's risks to minor safety, data privacy, and national security for American users.

    “The American people need the truth about the threat TikTok poses to our national and personal security,” committee chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wa.) said in her opening statement, concluding that “TikTok is a weapon.”

    Rodgers suggested that even for Americans who have never used the app, “TikTok surveils us all, and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is able to use this as a tool to manipulate America as a whole.”

    Read 25 remaining paragraphs | Comments